> Our review guidelines
The debate over mandatory bicycle helmets continues to spark heated discussions among cyclists, policymakers and safety advocates worldwide.
While some countries have already implemented strict helmet laws others maintain a choice-based approach leaving many wondering about the best path forward.
We at BikePush decided to ask over 10,000 of our Facebook followers what they think about helmet laws.
The results were pretty interesting!
They ranged from positive casual acceptance 😀:
“I think it should be, it’s safety, no one intends to fall and hit their head, but like helmets for motorcyclist or seat belts in cars.“
To an absolute NO-NO 😡:
“We dont need anymore jack ass laws we didnt elect anyone to be our daddy or mommy.“
When discussing whether helmets should be compulsory for cyclists, many people shared compelling reasons in favor of mandatory helmet use.
These responses often highlighted personal experiences and practical comparisons, making a strong case for the safety benefits helmets provide.
The Positive (bravo!)
One commenter emphasized the importance of helmets for children and teenagers, stating:
“For kids and teens, yes, but if we had better infrastructure to separate cars from bikes, it would not be such a necessity.”
This balanced view acknowledges both immediate safety needs while pointing to a broader solution. It’s a pragmatic take that many urban cycling advocates can relate to.
Now that’s what we call a powerful testimonial!
This cyclist’s experience vividly illustrates how a helmet can make the difference between a severe accident and a potentially catastrophic one.
“Would you drive a car without a seat belt”
Short and sweet, this response draws a parallel that’s hard to argue with.
It’s the kind of simple logic that really makes you think.
And it’s not just for cyclists….e-scooters also got a mention
This straightforward response extends the safety conversation beyond just cycling.
The Negative (ouch!)
Now let’s look at the other side of the helmet debate. Oh boy, there were some strong opinions! 🤯
These responses highlight concerns about personal freedom and the potential unintended consequences of mandatory helmet laws.
“Nope. Do we really need more governmental intrusion in our lives? It’s a personal choice.”
This response cuts right to the heart of a common argument against mandatory helmet laws – the question of individual liberty versus government regulation.
“Personal choice. I don’t wear a helmet unless doing a sponsored ride and then it is required”
Here’s a perspective from someone who adapts their helmet use based on circumstances, highlighting how many cyclists prefer to maintain control over their safety decisions.
This cyclist raises an interesting economic argument that’s often overlooked in the helmet debate – the potential impact on cycling participation and the broader cycling industry.
“No we don’t need more policing.”
Short and to the point!
Bit Of Both
Soem were a little on the fence, or saw both sides of the arguement.
“NO…to Helmets but YES to insurance.”
Here’s an interesting twist – suggesting an alternative approach to cycling safety that focuses on financial protection rather than physical protection.
It’s a reminder that there are multiple ways to think about cyclist safety.
So yeah, quite a few opinionated comments for the NO HELMETS side.
What The Results Show
From the comments in the post, we pulled out the following:
These were compiled from the 103 comments (at time of writing).
💭 In My Opinion: I actually expected to see the “yes” camp win, but I thought it was going to be closer to 50/50.
I think the pro-helmet wearers are more lycra-clad cyclists and perhaps the more leisurely cyclist aren’t as worried about helmets, so perhaps the BikePush Facebook followers are more in the lycra camp? 🤷
What Does Everyone Else Think?
Let’s wrap up this helmet debate, shall we?
It’s a hot topic in the cycling world, and for good reason.
On one side, we’ve got some pretty convincing evidence that helmets can be real lifesavers.
Studies show they can reduce the risk of head, brain, and severe brain injury by 63-88%. That’s huge! Australia saw a 46% drop in cycling fatalities after making helmets mandatory. It’s hard to argue with numbers like that.
But here’s where it gets tricky.
Some folks worry that forcing everyone to wear helmets might actually backfire. In places like Australia and New Zealand, they noticed fewer people cycling after helmet laws kicked in. 👮
That’s not great for public health or the environment. Plus, there’s this interesting idea that wearing a helmet might make some cyclists take more risks – kind of like feeling invincible.
Now, let’s talk about the Dutch. They’re basically cycling royalty, right? In the Netherlands, only about 1.6% of cyclists wear helmets, but they’ve got some of the safest cycling anywhere.
Their secret? Amazing bike lanes and infrastructure. It makes you wonder if we’re focusing on the right things.
At the end of the day, it’s all about finding that sweet spot between keeping people safe and not turning them off cycling altogether.
Maybe the answer isn’t a one-size-fits-all law, but rather encouraging helmet use while also making our streets safer for everyone on two wheels.
One thing’s for sure – as more people hop on bikes (which is awesome!), we need to keep talking about this. Whether you’re Team Helmet or Team Freedom, we all want the same thing: more people cycling safely and happily.
Let’s keep the conversation rolling! What are your thoughts on wearing helmets?
Drop a comment below, or chip into the Facebook debate!
The imams of the plastic hat can lick my sweaty anus after a century ride. The test has been done on mandatory helmets by Australia. The laws have utterly destroyed casual bike use, and moved people on bikes to a “mamils only” viscerally hated minority. I literally cannot say “fuck you” loud enough, to those who insisted on destroying something I love. Pre-helmet law in Australia 85% of kids rode a bike to school some of the time. When they started issuing fines, it took just two weeks for the bike racks to empty. Kids riding to school dropped to 5%. Thirty years later, those bike racks are still empty. Here’s the real kicker. Riding a bike got LESS safe, and pressure to build bike lanes vanished. If you want mandatory helmets, go rent a Hyundai, because you are in reality anti bike.