Home > Knowledge > Fitness and Training > Expensive Bike or Strong Legs: What Really Gets You Up Hills?

Expensive Bike or Strong Legs: What Really Gets You Up Hills?

Published:

BikePush is supported by our readers, we may receive a commission, at no extra cost to you - read more here
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
Receive cycling tips and updates straight to your inbox, completely free!
Subscribe here.

Was it the bike, or were they just stronger?

Two cyclists riding up a winding paved mountain roadPin

Bring that up at any café table and the old fight starts before the espresso lands. Expensive bike or strong legs?

Would a $13,500 road bike really change your day on a hill? Nobody at the table actually knows.

So we picked one hill and ran it through the numbers.

Same rider, same climb. An honest figure for the bike, and an honest figure for the legs.

One Hill, Two Ways To Buy Speed

💡 No doubt a pricier, lighter bike, helps on a hill, and it certainly feels faster. But cheap bikes get up hills too. I’ve never tested mine against the clock, so that’s only a hunch.

So we ran the numbers instead.

Picture one climb: about 7 miles at a steady 7% grade, gaining 2,600 feet. The rider weighs 180 lb, carries 5 lb of kit and holds a steady 200 watts.

They start on a 26 lb hybrid, about what a Trek FX 2 weighs.

Then we change one thing at a time. First they get a $13,500 S-Works Tarmac SL8, which weighs 14 lb 9.5 oz. Then they go back to the hybrid with 10% more power.

This is our own calculation, using a published, validated power model. The grade and drag figures are our estimates, so it’s a model, not a road test.

Time up the climb Time saved
26 lb hybrid, 200 watts70:47–
Same rider on the $13,500 bike65:455:02
Same hybrid, 10% more power64:406:08
The $13,500 bike and 10% more power60:0510:42

The expensive bike saves about 5 minutes, thanks to its lower weight, better position and faster tires.

Ten percent more power saves about 6.

So both buy real time on this climb, and the extra power buys a little more.

Do both and you save nearly 11 minutes.

A model is only arithmetic until a real road gets a vote.

Does The Road Agree With The Math?

Models are tidy. Roads are not, so we checked.

In one measured climb, a single strong rider at 300 watts rode 3.1 miles at 6.3% on two setups, bike and kit, that differed by 4.9 lb, the lighter one sacrificing some aerodynamics.

The lighter bike saved about 1.5%, roughly 15 seconds. That’s one rider and two runs per bike, but our model lands in the same small range.

Close-up of a bike computer on a road bike's handlebar with the rider's hands on the barsPin

Then there’s the messier evidence. A 2010 BMJ paper followed one rider over a 27-mile round-trip commute with 2,766 feet of climbing, on a 20.9 lb carbon bike and a 29.75 lb steel one.

The gap was 32 seconds, and the heavier steel bike was the quicker one.

That difference isn’t statistically meaningful. With no power meter, effort was never held steady.

The paper isn’t a climb test, and it doesn’t prove weight does nothing. It shows that in everyday riding, weather and effort can swamp the effect.

One more caveat. If the hybrid is heavier, at 28.67 lb, the bike swap saves 5:52.

Our answer moves with the hybrid’s exact weight, so treat 5:02 as an estimate.

So the bike’s minutes look real. What do the watts cost?

What Those Extra Watts Actually Cost You

Watt gains cost time, not money. In a 2013 training trial, 35 trained recreational cyclists did two interval sessions a week plus easy riding for seven weeks.

The group riding 4×8-minute intervals gained 11.4% on a combined fitness score. The easy-only group managed 4.2%.

That score isn’t a single wattage, and treating it as watts is an approximation. The riders were already trained, so results vary.

Still, read loosely, it puts the table’s 10% row within reach.

The 4×8 is four hard efforts of 8 minutes, with rest between. Twice a week.

In this 4×8 on a climb, copy the format, not his watts, because he’s a very strong rider.

The table hides one trade, though. A bike is bought once. Fitness has to be kept.

If long climbs are your goal, start with getting better at long climbs.

And if 200 watts means nothing to you, compare it with an average cyclist’s FTP.

When The Bike Really Is Holding You Back

Sometimes the legs aren’t the problem. A watts model assumes you can keep pedaling. It can’t price being stuck in too big a gear, grinding so slowly the pedals barely move.

🔧 You need gearing that gets you up. I hate grinding, so I want easy gears that keep my cadence high. A faster cadence makes me breathe harder, but it definitely gets me up the hill.

This video shows why easier gears help on steep climbs.

Weight is the other place a bike can hold you back, once it gets truly heavy.

👍 To me, heavy means over 10 kilos (22 lb), and that definitely makes a big difference. A lighter bike just feels easier. If it feels easier mentally, you might enjoy the climb more and maybe even go up a little quicker.

Before you blame the bike, rule out the mistakes on steep climbs.

Fit belongs on that list too, and you can fix your fit at home.

What The Numbers Can’t See

💡 I ride aluminum currently and I’ve had carbon before. I may go carbon again, but would it make me ride more? Maybe not. I ride anyway, though I may be an outlier because I just love cycling.

The table measures time on a climb. It can’t see how a bike feels under you, or how much you enjoy the ride.

If a new bike makes you want to ride more, or makes a climb feel less like a wall, that’s real value. It just shows up as motivation, not minutes.

Both are genuine reasons to buy.

One rider’s plain take: keep at the hills, and walking is no big deal.

And if the hills themselves put you off, start with how to stop fearing hills.

So What Would You Do With $1,500?

Our numbers point the same way: faster tires alone save about 1:18 on the whole climb, even coming off hybrid tires, and that figure is illustrative.

So the rule depends on your bike. Already on a road bike? Train.

💰 If you already have a road bike, $1,500 won’t really buy the upgrade. It won’t get you a whole lighter bike, and tires won’t make much difference. You’re probably better off training to climb a bit better.

On a heavy bike with too-big gears? Change the bike or the gearing.

Still tempted? First ask whether carbon frames are worth it.

The Bottom Line

👍 I’ve been passed on climbs by people on cheap bikes, and I’ve passed people on very expensive ones. A lot of climbing speed comes down to strength. As a very rough number, I’d say 80% person, 20% bike. Still, move a strong rider from a heavy, cheap bike to a light, expensive one that fits, and they’ll probably go up a lot quicker.

That 80/20 is a rough guess, not a measurement, and our table doesn’t prove it. What the table does show is that both options are real.

The bike buys minutes. Training can buy more, and you pay for it in hours.

So run the cheap experiment first. Pick your local hill, time a steady effort, ride intervals twice a week for seven weeks, then time it again.

You’ll have your own number for what your legs bought. For help on the way up, see how to climb steep hills.

Liked this breakdown? Share it with the rider who keeps staring at bike listings.👇

Mark BikePush
Article By:
Mark is the founder of BikePush, a cycling website. When he's not working on BikePush, you can find him out riding.

Leave a Comment