From London to Sydney, Amsterdam to Portland, cycling is more than recreation. It’s a smart, sustainable way to get to work.
Riders know the rewards: saving money, dodging traffic, improving health, and cutting pollution. Yet in many countries, drivers and transit riders receive more policy support than cyclists.
In the U.S., this tension surfaced in 2025 with the Bicycle Commuter Act of 2025. The bill promised to restore and modernize tax incentives for people who ride. Although it failed, the debate highlights lessons for cyclists everywhere.
Read more: Bike commuting tips
The Federal Bike Commuter Benefit: A First Step
In 2009, the U.S. introduced the Federal Bike Commuter Benefit, allowing employers to reimburse up to $20/month tax-free for commuting costs like storage or repairs.
It was small and flawed. You couldn’t combine it with other benefits, and it worked as reimbursement instead of a simple pre-tax deduction.
But it mattered: it recognized cycling as legitimate transport. Suspended in 2017, it was meant to return in 2026, sparking calls for a better system.
The Bicycle Commuter Act of 2025: A Rider’s Blueprint
Introduced in June 2025, the bill aimed to bring back the benefit and align it with modern mobility. It proposed higher savings, stackable perks, inclusion of e-bikes and shared mobility, and broader coverage for cycling costs.
📦 What Riders Could Have Gained
- 💵 Real savings: Up to $90/month (≈$1,000/year).
- 🔄 Fairness: Could combine with transit or parking benefits.
- ⚡ Modern mobility: E-bikes, bikeshare, scootershare included.
- 🛠️ Comprehensive coverage: Bike purchase, rental, repairs, storage, and safety gear.
- 🌍 Global relevance: Comparable to the UK’s Cycle to Work Scheme, EU e-bike subsidies, and Australian green commuter programs.
For everyday riders, this would have meant recognition that cycling is just as valid a way to commute as driving or catching a train.
The Setback: Repeal, Not Renewal
Instead of passing the Act, Congress went the opposite direction. In July 2025, lawmakers approved the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which permanently repealed the bike commuter benefit.
- The old $20/month won’t return in 2026.
- The expanded program never took effect.
- Employers can still support cycling, but not with federal tax-free incentives.
It was a major setback for U.S. cyclists and a reminder to riders globally: policy gains are fragile without continued advocacy.
Why It Matters Worldwide
Cycling benefits aren’t just financial. They:
- Ease congestion in cities.
- Cut emissions and improve air quality.
- Support healthier lifestyles.
- Offer affordable transport amid rising fuel and transit costs.
In the UK, the Cycle to Work Scheme helps commuters buy bikes tax-efficiently. Many European nations provide e-bike subsidies. In Australia, some employers fund end-of-trip facilities. The U.S. reversal is a warning: progress depends on pressure from riders and advocates.
The Bottom Line
The Bicycle Commuter Act of 2025 showed what’s possible: fairer treatment for cyclists, financial relief, and recognition of micromobility. Congress chose repeal instead, but the blueprint is there.
For cyclists in the U.S. and beyond, the message is clear: keep riding, keep speaking up, and keep demanding that governments treat bikes as essential transport — not an afterthought.
Find this useful? Why not share below? 👇
