Home > Knowledge > Do Cyclists Make Better Drivers? Here’s What the Research Found

Do Cyclists Make Better Drivers? Here’s What the Research Found

Published:

BikePush is supported by our readers, we may receive a commission, at no extra cost to you - read more here
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
Receive cycling tips and updates straight to your inbox, completely free!
Subscribe here.
A cyclist in a helmet loads a bike into the back of a car before a ridePin

If you ride most weeks, moments like that feel familiar. You wonder if all those miles taught your eyes something car-only drivers never learned. So, do cyclists make better drivers in a way science can measure?

Researchers have run the test in labs, in simulators, and on real streets with eye trackers on drivers. The answer is more interesting than a simple yes.

Riders Spot Changes Faster, But Not More Accurately

Picture a flicker test. Two almost identical road photos flash back and forth, and you hit the button the moment you catch what changed.

In Queensland, Australia, experienced drivers aged 30 to 50 took that test in a 2017 Australian lab study. About half also rode bikes. The rider-drivers spotted changes faster, especially changes involving bicycles and road signs.

Accuracy was the same in both groups. Riding seemed linked to quicker sorting of a road scene, not fewer misses. Think of it like a café crew that spots you at the counter sooner but mixes up just as many orders.

Photos in a lab aren’t driving, though. So researchers put drivers into cars.

On Real Streets, Riders Check Where Cyclists Come From

Turning at an intersection is where a quick glance in the wrong place can leave a rider exposed.

In a 2021 Toronto road study in Canada, 26 drivers aged 35 to 54 drove an instrumented car through city intersections while eye tracking recorded where they looked.

Drivers who didn’t cycle had 2.01 times the odds of a scanning failure while turning. A scanning failure means the eyes never landed where a pedestrian or cyclist could appear.

A miss like that is a warning sign, not a crash count. Still, it was measured on real roads, the closest of these studies to US driving.

That turning moment is the classic right-hook setup. Watch how a right hook unfolds in a real crash.

Other Studies Found No Difference At All

A cyclist appears small in a car's side mirror on a mountain roadPin

Here’s where the café-stop story gets humbling. Not every test finds the rider edge.

At the University of Nottingham, England, researchers ran two simulator studies in 2018 with eye tracking at T-junctions. They compared frequent cyclists with non-cyclists.

They found no differences on any visual attention measure. The pulling-out task was narrow, and the drivers were young. The result still counts, because the study was designed to catch a medium-sized effect if one was there.

Another wrinkle should worry every rider. In that same work, all drivers looked less at a distant bicycle than at a car or motorcycle moving at the same speed. A far-off rider draws less attention.

So stay bright and obvious, even around drivers who ride. Our guide to being visible lays out what helps.

Where Riders Really Stand Out: How They See Cyclists

If detection is mixed, attitudes are clearer. Drivers who ride talk about cyclists differently.

In Australia, a 2014 survey of nearly 2,000 drivers found that those who also cycle were 1.5 times more likely to report safe habits around cyclists.

A second Australian survey from 2019 dug into something darker. On a visual scale of humanness, 55% of non-cyclists rated cyclists as less than fully human, compared with 30% of cyclists.

In that Australian pilot survey, those dehumanizing attitudes predicted self-reported aggression, such as deliberately driving close to a rider. How often someone rode didn’t predict aggression once attitudes were accounted for, so the link runs through attitude more than mileage.

Do Cyclists Crash Less? The Insurance Number Everyone Quotes

A road bike mounted on a car roof rack on a city streetPin

This is the number that launched a thousand Facebook arguments.

Chris Knott Insurance, a UK insurer, said in 2018 that 13% of its insured drivers made at least one claim a year, compared with 6% of customers on its cyclist-driver policy. Less than half the claim rate sounds decisive. It isn’t.

Those are one insurer’s customers, not a national crash file. People who buy a cyclist policy may already differ. They may belong to cycling clubs, drive fewer miles, or be careful people to begin with.

A claim also isn’t the same as an at-fault crash. And the insurer sells that policy.

Then there’s self-selection, the quiet problem under all of this. Careful, patient people may be the ones who take up riding. None of these studies can tell whether cycling creates careful drivers or careful people choose cycling.

Most important, no study we could find has compared real-world crash records for drivers who ride with crash records for drivers who don’t.

What This Means Next Time You’re Behind the Wheel (or in the Saddle)

Riding gives you a head start. It doesn’t make you immune.

In a 2025 Swedish study using a driving simulator with an immersive headset, drivers missed a proper check for cyclists coming up from behind in nearly half of intersection approaches. Cycling experience alone made no significant difference.

Only cautious drivers who also cycled checked more often, and even they skipped the rear check in about a third of passes. Participants knew only about half the rules on checking for riders behind.

Use that as your rule. Before every right turn, check the mirror and over the shoulder for a bike. Assume a rider could be coming up on your right, then turn.

Our explainer on entering a bike lane shows where that check matters most.

As a rider, flip the lesson and don’t assume a driver sees you, even one with a bike rack and tan lines. Ride like you’re briefly invisible at intersections, and signal early.

Riding helps. Habits matter more.

The Bottom Line

Drivers who ride probably notice cyclists sooner and think better of them. Several studies found faster change detection, better scanning in turns, and kinder reported attitudes.

Yet other studies found no difference at all. The only real-world claims figure comes with heavy caveats, and no study we found shows cyclist-drivers crash less.

So keep the identity, lose the swagger. Let riding make you the driver who looks twice, leaves space, and expects the rider in the blind spot.

Know a riding buddy who swears the bike made them a better driver? Pass this along👇

Mark BikePush
Article By:
Mark is the founder of BikePush, a cycling website. When he's not working on BikePush, you can find him out riding.

Leave a Comment